Urban heat is not a myth

Thu, 07/10/2014 - 8:40am
Kevin Dennehy , Yale Univ.

This photo of the U.S. at night illustrates the bright lights of the nation's urban centers. Image: NASAA new Yale Univ.-led study quantifies for the first time the primary causes of the “urban heat island” (UHI) effect, a common phenomenon that makes the world’s urban areas significantly warmer than the surrounding countryside and may increase health risks for city residents.

In an analysis of 65 cities across North America, researchers found that variation in how efficiently urban areas release heat back into the lower atmosphere—through the process of convection—is the dominant factor in the daytime UHI effect. This finding challenges a long-held belief that the phenomenon is driven principally by diminished evaporative cooling through the loss of vegetation.

The effects of impaired “convective efficiency” are particularly acute in wet climates, the researchers say. In cities such as Atlanta, Georgia, and Nashville, Tennessee, this factor alone contributes a 3 C rise in average daytime temperatures, according to the study, published in Nature.

The phenomenon could have profound impacts on human health in cities worldwide as mean global temperatures continue to rise—and as more and more people move into cities—said Xuhui Lee, the Sara Shallenberger Brown Professor of Meteorology at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies (F&ES) and one of the study’s authors.

“There is a synergistic relationship between climate conditions and the urban heat island,” Lee said. “This relationship suggests that the urban heat island will exacerbate heat wave stress on human health in wet climates where temperature effects are already compounded by high humidity.

“This is a huge concern from a public health perspective.”

For years scientists have recognized the primary causes of the UHI effect. In addition to the changes in convection efficiency and evaporative cooling, these include the tendency of buildings, pavement and other structures to store more heat than vegetation and soil; heat generated by human-built industrial systems and changes to the albedo of the Earth’s surface. (Albedo refers to the proportion of sunlight or radiation reflected by the surface of the planet. Light-colored parking lots, for instance, reflect more sunlight back into space than darker surfaces.)

Using satellite data of land surface temperatures and vegetation cover from cities in the U.S. and Canada, researchers calculated the mean temperature differentials between urban centers and their rural surroundings during both daytime and nighttime hours. They also used climate modeling to produce a more complex range of variables—from air density to aerodynamic resistance—which were then used to quantify the roles of each of the primary drivers of UHI (radiation, convection, evaporation, heat storage and human-generated heat).

Their results reaffirmed the consensus view that, regardless of the local climate, the release of heat stored in human-built structures is the dominant contributor to UHI during the nighttime.

But during the daytime, researchers found, convection is the dominant factor—particularly in “wetter” cities of the southeastern U.S. In those places, the smooth surfaces of buildings and other human-made features are far less conducive to heat diffusion than the densely vegetated areas that surround them. Overall, in wetter climates urbanization reduces convection efficiency by 58%.

“The ‘rougher’ surfaces of the vegetation triggers turbulence, and turbulence removes heat from the surface to the atmosphere,” said Lei Zhao, a doctoral student at F&ES and lead author of the study. “But where there is a smoother surface, there is less convection and the heat will be trapped in the surface.”

Convection plays a key role in drier cities, too—albeit with far different consequences. In those settings—including in urban areas of the U.S. Southwest where surrounding vegetation is typically shorter and scrubbier—the rural areas are less effective at dissipating heat. As a result, the urban landscapes are actually 20% more efficient in removing heat than their rural surroundings, triggering a 1.5 C cooling within the cities.

Source: Yale Univ.


Share This Story

You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.