Water woes likely based on warmer temperatures

Posted In: R&D Daily | Carbon Footprint | Climate | Global Climate Change | Research | Biology | Engineering | Purdue University

newsvine diigo google
slashdot
Share
Loading...

Wabash River

Keith Cherkauer, an assistant professor of agricultural and biological engineering, surveys the Wabash River, one of many that could experience an increase in winter and spring flooding based on rising temperatures in the next century. (Purdue Agricultural Communication photo/Tom Campbell)

Several Midwestern states could be facing increased winter and spring flooding, as well as difficult growing conditions on farms, if average temperatures rise, according to a Purdue Univ. researcher.

Keith Cherkauer, an assistant professor of agricultural and biological engineering, ran simulation models that show Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan could see as much as 28 percent more precipitation by the year 2070, with much of that coming in the winter and spring. His projections also show drier summer and fall seasons.

"This was already a difficult spring to plant because of how wet it was. If you were to add another inch or so of rain to that, it would be a problem," said Cherkauer, whose findings were published in the early online version of the Journal of Great Lakes Research. "It could make it difficult to get into fields. There's also a potential for more flooding."

Cherkauer used three different scenarios based on the amount of carbon that could be emitted into the atmosphere in the coming decades. Carbon calculations were based on assumptions including population, technological advancements, the economy and other factors.

Those scenarios were used in two climate projection models from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that give climate predictions from the years 1950 through 2099. Cherkauer said in years from 1950 to 2007 where actual climate data differed slightly from projections, the difference was subtracted to give a better projection for the future.

He calculated that winters in the four states could be between 2.7 degrees to 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit warmer by 2077 than today. Summers could be between 3.6 degrees and 10.8 degrees Fahrenheit warmer.

Those projections were then put into the Variable Infiltration Capacity Model - which simulates how precipitation moves through land surface environments - to predict stream flow for six rivers: the Chippewa River, Wisconsin River, Illinois River, Wabash River, Grand River and Rock River.

Cherkauer estimates that increased precipitation would result in about a 20 percent increase in peak and mean flows for the Wabash River, for instance.

Daily river flow would be lower during the summer and fall despite an expected increase in thunderstorms and heavy-rain events. Overall precipitation would be down in those seasons, he said, and heavy rains from time to time would still leave prolonged periods without precipitation.

"This area is not going to be short of water, but we may not have it at the right times," Cherkauer said. "We probably need to figure out how to store the excess water from the spring so we have it in the summer when we need it."

He said there are several possible avenues for storing spring water, from damming rivers to create reservoirs, to refilling aquifers that are pumped for water in the summer.

Cherkauer said next he wants to study how climate predictions would affect drought conditions, as well as how the projections on stream flow would impact aquatic life and ecology. NASA funded his research.

Cherkauer's work is affiliated with the Purdue Climate Change Research Center and the Center for the Environment in Discovery Park.

SOURCE 

4 Comments

  • Why does this website continue to perpetutate this questionable science? At this point, anything from associated with the IgoPonCC has a confidence level just above the flat-Earthers.

  • If one needs further proof that so-called “climatologists” aren’t scientists, look at the non-existent physics foundation for these “researchers” continuing to blame implicitly miniscule quantities of anthropogenic CO2 for alleged future Earth surface temperature increases while pointedly ignoring the much larger effects of water vapor. Although CO2 partial pressures from ocean water increase with temperature, for the same delta T, the increases in H2O partial pressures fall on a much steeper curve. Furthermore, the quantity of anthropogenic CO2 is woefully inadequate to produce the alleged heating using hard science absorption spectra, not “computer simulations.” These “researchers” seem blind to the fact that since the Sun supplies 99.99% of the power heating the Earth, when the solar output declines, so will the average temperature. With the steady decline in sunspot numbers during the past two 11-year solar cycles, real “researchers” might want to think in terms of an approaching Little Ice Age which may prove to be more likely. The current solar cycle reached zero sunspots in 2007 and three years later the Sun is still essentially sunspot free. Is it coincidental that an unprecedented increase of 1 million square kilometers in the surface area of north polar pack ice from October 2007 to October 2009 began when the sunspots vanished off the solar photosphere? Zeeman spectra taken of sunspots show that sunspot maximum involves much higher solar magnetic activity together with increased output power from the Sun.

  • All the models quoted, particularly those from the IPCC, are woefully inadequate to give any absolute numbers (even the somewhat large range) quoted in the article. The models might be enough to predict a trend. If increase rainfall might be a possibility in the future, it might be nice to see someone come up with ideas to mitigate the problems instead of just sounding alarms.

  • Another MODEL/SIMULATION, i.e., not real, just a guess, or since he is a 'scientist', SWAG, using the old garbage-in/garbage-out 'what are the results that I want simulation. Tried and true, it is not new and I saw it used over 30 years ago when I was being trained as a 'scientist', also. So everybody make their own guess, and all of us trained scientists get to call them SWAGS. My SWAG is that, based on over 30 years of SERIOUS outdoor experience, nature is doing what nature does - change.

blog comments powered by Disqus

New To Market

more

JEOL to launch world's smallest solid-state NMR probe
JEOL to launch world's smallest solid-state NMR probe

According to JEOL Resonance, a new benchmark for resolution and benchmark will be set with its introduction next week of a new 0.75-mm solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) probe. The probe is capable of high resolution sample analysis by spinning the sample at 110 kHz, the world's fastest spinning speed for NMR.

Energy Harvesting Subsystems for Wireless Sensors

Nextreme Thermal Solutions has developed two new energy harvesting subsystems for the plumbing and HVAC industries. The subsystems are the latest additions to Nextreme's Thermobility energy harvesting platform that uses thin-film thermoelectric technology to convert available thermal energy into electric power for a variety of autonomous self-powered applications.

Tools & Technology

more

Portable Logic Analyzer
Portable Logic Analyzer

Oscium has announced the launch of LogiScope. LogiScope is a logic analyzer, designed for the iOS family of products like the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch, with the real-time data analysis capabilities of an oscilloscope.

Phase Monitor for Visual Observation of Materials

Supercritical Fluid Technologies Inc.'s SFT Phase Monitor II is a tool for determining the solubility of various compounds and mixtures in supercritical and high-pressure fluids. It provides direct, visual observation of materials under conditions precisely controlled by the researcher.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Top Stories and Headlines
EVERY DAY!

FREE Email Newsletter